The heaviest component. A team's wins divided by total completed games, with ties counting as half a win and half a loss (NCAA convention). A team that goes 14-4 has a WP of .778. Standard NCAA RPI uses 25% WP, but this site weights it higher because the CCAA's three leagues play almost entirely separate schedules. Winning your games still has to mean something, even when raw schedule comparisons across leagues are limited.

The schedule-strength component. For each CCAA opponent a team faced, their WP is calculated excluding games against that team (to avoid circular inflation). Those individual WPs are then averaged. A high OWP means you played a gauntlet, with teams that were beating everyone else on their schedule too.

One more degree of separation. OOWP is the average OWP of your CCAA opponents, essentially asking "how strong were the schedules of the teams you played?" It smooths out the noise from a single dominant or weak opponent and gives a fuller picture of league context.

A league-context adjustment unique to this site. CLSI averages two signals: league depth (the share of teams in your league posting a winning record, excluding yourself) and within-league position (your WP relative to your league's leader). A team in a deep league with five winning programs gets credit for the gauntlet. A team that's the best of a thinner league still gets credit for being the best. The two together prevent a strong record built against a top-heavy league from outweighing a comparable record built across a balanced one.

All completed games count toward a team's own WP, with ties counting as half a win and half a loss. However, OWP and OOWP only use games against other CCAA opponents. Non-league opponents (tournaments, scrimmages, out-of-conference opponents) are excluded from the schedule-strength components. CLSI is computed entirely from current CCAA league standings.

The three CCAA leagues (Mountain, Sunset, and Ocean) don't play a shared schedule, which means a league record alone can't tell you how a Mountain team stacks up against an Ocean team. RPI solves that by combining results with schedule strength in a single cross-league number. Standard NCAA RPI weights schedule strength heavily (75% of the formula), but in a conference where leagues barely cross over, that can punish winning teams unfairly. A dominant team in a down league gets dragged below a mediocre team in a loaded one. At the same time, OWP alone struggles when one league is top-heavy: a team that piles up wins against thin competition can post a strong record without facing many tough opponents. This site uses a 50/25/10/15 weighting that keeps results as the primary driver while adding CLSI to capture league context that OWP misses. CLSI rewards both league depth and being the best (or among the best) within your league, so a team going 14-5 in a top-heavy league doesn't automatically outrank a team going 17-8 in a balanced one. A team in a thinner league can still climb if they're clearly the class of that league. It's built for the shape of the CCAA specifically: three leagues that rarely intersect, with real talent gaps between them and uneven depth across them. RPI is not the only measure of a team's quality, but it is the most cross-league-comparable one available.